Re: 7.0 vs 7.1 running select count(*) FROM table WHERE (SELECT count(*) ) > 0;

From: Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Taylor <rod(dot)taylor(at)inquent(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 7.0 vs 7.1 running select count(*) FROM table WHERE (SELECT count(*) ) > 0;
Date: 2001-02-28 23:12:38
Message-ID: 3A9D85E6.7B591B54@selectacast.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> "Rod Taylor" <rod(dot)taylor(at)inquent(dot)com> writes:
> > Query on 7.0 on Ultra II took over 5 hours. Query on 7.1 on x86 took
> > under 10 seconds. Same data.
>
> Good ... I guess, because I'm not sure why the difference. We haven't
> done very much in the optimizer since 7.0. What are the full
> declarations of these tables and their indexes?
>
> regards, tom lane

Sometimes your production and development machines have different data
so behave differently. With postgres this is more of a problem than in
general because of the planner.

RT: have you tried the same query with the same data on your development
machine with 7.0?

--
Joseph Shraibman
jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Christophe Boggio 2001-02-28 23:32:19 Performance tuning
Previous Message John Madden 2001-02-28 23:10:19 how to vacuum from cron?