Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Re: Chinese patch for Pgaccess

From: "He Weiping(Laser Henry)" <laser(at)zhengmai(dot)com(dot)cn>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Re: Chinese patch for Pgaccess
Date: 2001-02-23 03:14:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
> > appropriate. There are several encodings for Chinese including
> > GB(EUC-CN), Big5, EUC-TW. At least we should be able to distinguish
> > them. What about "chinese(GB)" or whatever?
> Renamed to chinese-gb.

I think chinese-gb is ok, thanks!



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-02-23 03:50:48
Subject: Re: problem while compiling user c functions in 7.1beta4
Previous:From: Philip WarnerDate: 2001-02-23 01:53:09
Subject: Re: Open 7.1 items

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-02-23 04:04:23
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Re: Chinese patch for Pgaccess
Previous:From: JeffDate: 2001-02-23 01:48:35
Subject: CGI Error

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2001-02-23 03:15:46
Subject: Re: Questions to lists / translations
Previous:From: Gregory WoodDate: 2001-02-23 03:13:21
Subject: Re: Date types in where clause of PreparedStatement

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group