Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol

From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL odbc list <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RE: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] 6.2 protocol
Date: 2001-02-12 23:44:17
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-odbc
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Removal seemed to obvious to discuss, I guess, and when I got on OK, I
> > > was on my way.
> >
> > Since you obvious had to have had some sort of discussion and approval
> > (especially after all that you and I have discussed) for the original
> > patch, a similar discussion and approval should have been attained for
> > removing it ... someone had to have liked the original patch to have given
> > you the go-ahead on it, right?
> I am confused.  The Hiroshi point was the <=6.3 compatibility code
> removal.  That was never submitted as a patch.  If you are referring to
> that one, it was added back in the 6.4 days, I guess, but obviously has
> little use now that we are on 7.1.

Please tell me how long I could be away from key board.

Hiroshi Inoue

In response to

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2001-02-13 08:24:09
Subject: RE: [ODBC] RE: 7.1 beta 3 Linux ODBC BEGINBehaviour
Previous:From: Hiroshi InoueDate: 2001-02-12 23:16:32
Subject: Re: [ODBC] RE: 7.1 beta 3 Linux ODBC BEGINBehaviour

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group