Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > FOREIGN KEY INSERT & UPDATE/DELETE in transaction "change violation"
> You're certainly not going to want to fix this now after having stared at
> it for a year? It's not trivial.
What does this item mean ?
> > Usernames limited in length
> Yeah, they are. ;-)
> If this is referring to pg_passwd, I just had a closer look and it's
> really a desaster. Both password and username as well as line length and
> file length (in lines) have arbitrary limits, sometimes not even
> consistent ones. To fix this to a point where one is confident that
> everything works one essentially would have to rewrite the whole thing.
> > Does pg_dump preserve COMMENTs?
> > Fix ipcclean on Linux
> Consider it done.
> > Merge global and template BKI files?
> Not this release.
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net http://yi.org/peter-e/
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-01-26 04:15:09|
|Subject: Re: BETWEEN patch |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2001-01-26 03:13:29|
|Subject: Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report [ Was: Looking for . . . ] |
pgsql-jdbc by date
|Next:||From: Hiroshi Inoue||Date: 2001-01-26 04:18:15|
|Subject: Re: Open 7.1 items|
|Previous:||From: Ron Sofrin||Date: 2001-01-26 03:57:32|
|Subject: Invoking sql functions through jdbc|