| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthew <matt(at)ctlno(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Using Threads? |
| Date: | 2000-12-05 01:18:44 |
| Message-ID: | 3A2C4274.D58673CA@wgcr.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Matthew wrote:
> The primary advantage that I see is that a single postgres process
> can benefit from multiple processors. I see little advantage to using thread
> for client connections.
Multiprocessors best benefit multiple backends. And the current forked
model lends itself admirably to SMP.
And I say that even after using a multithreaded webserver (AOLserver)
for three and a half years. Of course, AOLserver also sanely uses the
multi process PostgreSQL backends in a pooled fashion, but that's beside
the point.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nathan Myers | 2000-12-05 02:02:06 | Re: Bitmap index |
| Previous Message | Bruce Guenter | 2000-12-04 23:57:29 | Re: Using Threads? |