Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: beta testing version

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: beta testing version
Date: 2000-12-04 07:11:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> In fact, it might seem to be common courtesy...

An odd choice of words coming from you Don.

We are offering our services and expertise to a community outside
-hackers, as a business formed in a way that this new community expects
to see. Nothing special or sinister here. Other than it seems to have
raised the point that you expected each of us to be working for you,
gratis, on projects you find compelling, using all of our available
time, far into the future just as each of us has over the last five

After your recent spewing, it irks me a little to admit that this will
not change, and that we are likely to continue to each work on OS
PostgreSQL projects using all of our available time, just as we have in
the past.

A recent example of non-sinister change in another area is the work done
to release 7.0.3. This is a release which would not have happened in
previous cycles, since we are so close to beta on 7.1. But GB paid Tom
Lane to work on it as part of *their* business plan, and he sheparded it
through the cycle. There was no outcry from you at this presumption, and
on this diversion of community resources for this effort. Not sure why,
other than you chose to pick some other fight.

And no matter which fight you chose, you're wasting the time of others
as you fight your demons.

                   - Thomas

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Don BaccusDate: 2000-12-04 07:18:32
Subject: Re: redundancy and disk i/o
Previous:From: Dominic J. EidsonDate: 2000-12-04 07:03:03
Subject: Re: redundancy and disk i/o

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group