Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: problem

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com>, James Hall <James(dot)Hall(at)RadioShack(dot)com>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: problem
Date: 2000-11-07 19:22:12
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-ports
[cc: list changed -- GENERAL bcc'd, PORTS cc'd]

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Lamar Owen writes:
> > I think that by packaging the RPM's to include as simply
> > (as long as 2.x's are link-compatible), I can help alleviate
> > this problem for future builds.

> The symlink order will not be changed, other improvements are
> welcome.

I'm not asking for a change in the core tarball.  

I could say more, but I've said it elsewhere, and it really doesn't
deserve repeating, as the decision to continue library versioning in the
core tarball has been made, and I'm not going to question that decision

The changes I am likely to make, barring good technical reasons to not
do so are:
1.)	For RedHat 6.x RPM's (as well as RPM's for other distributions that
originally shipped PostgreSQL 6.5.x or 6.4.x), ship a symlink to for;
2.)	For all RPM's, change the symlinks to be: -> is the library itself ->  (so as to not break compatibility)

No changes are contemplated for compatibility -- there are
differences there -- but, of course, if sound technical reasons are
found to do so, I can deal with that as well.

I just want to make it easier to deal with our RPM's, that's all.  But,
as always, I am open to technical suggestions.
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to


pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-11-07 20:48:16
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] problem
Previous:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2000-11-07 18:56:59
Subject: Re: problem

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Lamar OwenDate: 2000-11-07 19:23:34
Subject: Re: problem
Previous:From: Michelle MurrainDate: 2000-11-07 19:14:36
Subject: Re: filemaker to pgsql ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group