Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.

From: "Kevin O'Gorman" <kogorman(at)pacbell(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)hub(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.
Date: 2000-10-28 19:12:00
Message-ID: 39FB2500.2C403777@pacbell.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Concur.

++ kevin

> Subject: Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.
> Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 12:41:19 -0400
> From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
> CC: PGSQL Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>, pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us
> References: <39FA27A4(dot)A68C08DD(at)pacbell(dot)net> <200010281544(dot)LAA08525(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> <20001028113853(dot)A25462(at)lerami(dot)lerctr(dot)org>
>
> Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> > Err, with Tom's objections, why was this applied?
>
> > * Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> [001028 11:34]:
> >> Applied. Thanks.
>
> Itchy trigger finger today, Bruce?
>
> Please revert the change --- I'm still discussing it with Kevin offlist,
> but I don't feel it's acceptable as-is because it breaks reasonable
> (non-redundant) UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT constructs that have worked for
> several releases past.
>
> regards, tom lane

--
Kevin O'Gorman (805) 650-6274 mailto:kogorman(at)pacbell(dot)net
Permanent e-mail forwarder: mailto:Kevin.O'Gorman(dot)64(at)Alum(dot)Dartmouth(dot)org
At school: mailto:kogorman(at)cs(dot)ucsb(dot)edu
Web: http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~kogorman/index.html
Web: http://trixie.kosman.via.ayuda.com/~kevin/index.html

"There is a freedom lying beyond circumstance,
derived from the direct intuition that life can
be grounded upon its absorption in what is
changeless amid change"
-- Alfred North Whitehead

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-28 19:41:24 Re: Gram.y patches for better parenthesis handling.
Previous Message Kevin O'Gorman 2000-10-28 18:48:14 Re: syntax