| From: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |
| Date: | 2000-10-27 20:04:39 |
| Message-ID: | 39F9DFD7.ABE486FE@wgcr.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> > Unfortunately RPM deems a dependency upon libpq.so.2.0 to not be
> > fulfilled by libpq.so.2.1 (how _can_ it know? A client linked to 2.0
> > might fail if 2.1 were to be loaded under it (hypothetically)).
> There usually are no such problems, and I'm not aware of any specific
> to postgresql either.
There have been reports to the pgsql-bugs list and to the PHP list about
this very issue.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Davis | 2000-10-27 20:22:06 | SELECT and server side functions |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-27 20:03:19 | Re:RPM dependencies (Was: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-10-27 20:07:00 | Re: Summary: what to do about INET/CIDR |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-27 20:03:19 | Re:RPM dependencies (Was: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-27 22:06:22 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |
| Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-10-27 20:03:19 | Re:RPM dependencies (Was: 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)) |