Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: signals in ODBC?

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Cedar Cox <cedarc(at)visionforisrael(dot)com>
Cc: Kovacs Zoltan Sandor <tip(at)pc10(dot)radnoti-szeged(dot)sulinet(dot)hu>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: signals in ODBC?
Date: 2000-10-26 14:03:49
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
> Huh?  First of all, the documentation says that NOTIFY does take an
> argument.  Secondly, I tried it in two psql's and it appears to work.  I
> now understand what the other talk was about, LISTEN is only checked once
> after each query (correct?).

I was not clear on my nonsequiteur: Commercial Ingres allows you to post
a *message* with the notifying event, rather than just the event itself.
But it is not relevant to the current PostgreSQL implementation, so why
did I add to the confusion? I don't know ;)

                      - Thomas

In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-10-26 14:43:00
Subject: Re: signals in ODBC?
Previous:From: Peter MountDate: 2000-10-26 13:49:49
Subject: RE: JDBC help

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group