| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source |
| Date: | 2000-07-26 05:21:06 |
| Message-ID: | 397E7542.ADD408E1@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> $ wc InterBase/dsql/parse.y
> 4217 13639 103059 InterBase/dsql/parse.y
> $ wc postgresql-7.0.2/src/backend/parser/gram.y
> 5858 20413 149104 postgresql-7.0.2/src/backend/parser/gram.y
Hmm. I suspect that I could shrink our gram.y by ~25% just by removing
comments and C support routines, and by consolidating some execution
blocks onto fewer lines. Does it look like their parse.y is more dense
than ours, do they do a lot of postprocessing to eliminate the yacc
rules, or have we missed the boat on writing the grammar in yacc?
Just curious; I probably won't look myself since I don't want to run the
risk of compromising our code and licensing. Or is that not an issue
with the Inprise license?
- Thomas
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Bitmead | 2000-07-26 05:56:12 | Re: Inprise InterBase(R) 6.0 Now Free and Open Source |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-07-26 05:20:18 | Re: Installation Report for powerpc-apple-netbsdelf1.5 |