Re: libpq compression

On 25.03.2019 13:48, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:39 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/25/19 1:04 PM, Konstantin Knizhnik wrote:
>>>
>>> On 25.03.2019 11:06, David Steele wrote:
>>>> Konstantin,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This patch appears to be failing tests so I have marked it Waiting on
>>>> Author.
>>>>
>>>> I have also removed the reviewer since no review had been done. Maybe
>>>> somebody else will have a look.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>> Can you please inform me which tests are failed?
>>> I have done "make check-world" and there were no failed tests.
>>> Actually if compression is not enabled (and it is disabled by default
>>> unless explicitly requested by client), there should be no difference
>>> with vanilla Postgres.
>>> So it will be strange if some tests are failed without using compression.
>> Check out the cfbot report at http://commitfest.cputube.org
> I guess it's red because the last posted patch happened to be my experimental
> patch (based indeed on a broken revision v11), not the one posted by Konstantin.
Rebased version of my patch is attached.

--

Konstantin Knizhnik
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company