| From: | Richard Broersma <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pet Peeves? |
| Date: | 2009-01-29 15:46:13 |
| Message-ID: | 396486430901290746w3d5a618ds426161b6abcfdb79@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> So, what do people say? Is Postgres perfect in your world or does it do some
> things which rub you the wrong way?
I would like to see the SQL92 feature for allowing sub-queries in
CHECK constraints, instead of marking this feature as "intentionally
omitted".
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2009-01-29 15:51:09 | Re: Text search segmentation fault |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-29 15:46:08 | Re: Changing owner of pg_toast tables |