| From: | "Richard Broersma" <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | JDBC driver feature implementation lists |
| Date: | 2008-09-02 22:01:54 |
| Message-ID: | 396486430809021501o3cc136a5wff39de40620a9046@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
In a previous email:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2008-09/msg00004.php
it was brought to my attention that a JDBC feature was intentionally
excluded from the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver. Aside from programatically
scanning the databasemetadata, would there be any problem to creating
and maintaining a lists of included and excluded features. (Does this
list already exist some where?)
PostgreSQL has a list like this:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/unsupported-features-sql-standard.html
Also noticed that in some cases reasons are given for why STANDARD SQL
features that are intentionally excluded.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bob Bruynooghe | 2008-09-05 12:14:51 | scale parameter to setObject method |
| Previous Message | Ingmar Lötzsch | 2008-09-02 15:26:03 | Re: Table Alias posing problem in Update statements |