| From: | "Richard Broersma" <richard(dot)broersma(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgus-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Draft bylaws are now available |
| Date: | 2008-06-10 20:30:56 |
| Message-ID: | 396486430806101330g2f243e51g2186ad9bf929752e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgus-general |
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:08 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Well there is no resolution that states that you have to be a US Citizen
> or anything like that. I don't know that I would want one either. For
> example, I plan on joining PG.IT and PG.FR.
>
> It is the bylaws, resolutions and agreed upon mission that make up what
> the corporation is doing, so if we get 50 Europeans that want to help us
> work on PostgreSQL in the US , I think that is great.
That's fine. The initent of the by-laws are effective in pointing out
that no person can be excluded based upon *any* kind of profiling.
However, to me it wasn't clear that residence (which is not
necessarily the same as citizenship) wasn't one of the profiling
classifications mentioned in the list.
--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.
Visit the Los Angles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2008-06-11 15:11:09 | Re: Draft bylaws are now available |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-06-10 19:55:14 | Re: Draft bylaws are now available |