Tim Perdue wrote:
> On wednesday or thursday, I'm going to be publishing my article on MySQL
> vs. Postgres on PHPBuilder.com.
> Postgres is undoubtedly far, far more advanced than MySQL is. Postgres
> now supports foreign keys, which can help with referential integrity.
> Postgres supports subselects and better support for creating tables as
> the result of queries. The "transaction" support that MySQL lacks is
> included in Postgres, although you'll never miss it on a website, unless
> you're building something for a bank, and if you're doing that, you'll
> use oracle.
Since MySQL version 3.23.16 it supports transactions with sleepycats DB3
and since version 3.23.19 it is under the GPL.
SIX Offene Systeme GmbH · Stuttgart - Berlin - New York
Sielminger Straße 63 · D-70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen
Fon +49 711 9909164 · Fax +49 711 9909199 http://www.six.de
PHP-Stand auf Europas grösster Linux-Messe: 'LinuxTag 2001'
weitere Infos @ http://www.dynamic-webpages.de/
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2000-07-04 19:52:30|
|Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Problem with recv syscall on socket when other side closed connection |
|Previous:||From: Mikheev, Vadim||Date: 2000-07-04 19:47:32|
|Subject: RE: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres|