Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres

From: Egon Schmid <eschmid(at)php(dot)net>
To: Tim Perdue <tperdue(at)valinux(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres
Date: 2000-07-04 19:51:11
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tim Perdue wrote:
> On wednesday or thursday, I'm going to be publishing my article on MySQL
> vs. Postgres on


> Features:
> Postgres is undoubtedly far, far more advanced than MySQL is. Postgres
> now supports foreign keys, which can help with referential integrity.
> Postgres supports subselects and better support for creating tables as
> the result of queries. The "transaction" support that MySQL lacks is
> included in Postgres, although you'll never miss it on a website, unless
> you're building something for a bank, and if you're doing that, you'll
> use oracle.

Since MySQL version 3.23.16 it supports transactions with sleepycats DB3
and since version 3.23.19 it is under the GPL.


SIX Offene Systeme GmbH · Stuttgart  -  Berlin  -  New York
Sielminger Straße 63   ·    D-70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen
Fon +49 711 9909164 · Fax +49 711 9909199
PHP-Stand auf Europas grösster Linux-Messe: 'LinuxTag 2001'
weitere Infos @

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-07-04 19:52:30
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Fwd: Problem with recv syscall on socket when other side closed connection
Previous:From: Mikheev, VadimDate: 2000-07-04 19:47:32
Subject: RE: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group