From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Makefile for parser |
Date: | 2000-06-27 14:05:11 |
Message-ID: | 3958B497.C6535736@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Oh, right, the files in that directory are going to include parse.h
> from the include dir now, instead of ".", aren't they? I see your
> problem.
Right.
> Probably the rule that installs parse.h into the include tree ought to
> be pushed down from backend/Makefile to backend/parser/Makefile (but
> backend/Makefile still needs to invoke it during its prebuildheaders
> phase). Maybe likewise for fmgroids.h into backend/utils.
I've got (simple) patches which do this for parse.h. I can see why this
was pushed up, since it is not very clean to have Makefiles putting
their fingers into other places in the tree. But for this case I don't
see a way out.
Peter E?
- Thomas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-27 14:14:37 | Re: SQL99 functions |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB | 2000-06-27 13:52:01 | AW: Proposal: More flexible backup/restore via pg_dump |