Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes --Results!

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>, pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes --Results!
Date: 2000-06-26 13:17:37
Message-ID: 395757F1.C2079910@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

> I noticed the other day that the geometry output differs with the
> compiler optimization level. That can't be good.

It depends where the differences are. If they are just in the last few
decimal places, then it should be OK (though annoying for regression
test support).

With higher optimizations, they may be doing more inlining and using
different code sequences for, for example, the transcendental functions.

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adriaan Joubert 2000-06-26 13:29:40 Re: [PORTS] Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes --Results!
Previous Message Brian E Gallew 2000-06-26 12:44:10 Re: About the pid and opts files

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adriaan Joubert 2000-06-26 13:29:40 Re: [PORTS] Re: Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes --Results!
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-06-26 12:29:43 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for port testing on fmgr changes -- Results!