From: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | chris(at)bitmead(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2000-02-03 04:11:01 |
Message-ID: | 3898FFD5.5D40C507@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Again, I think you've got the default backwards. I remind you also
> of something we've been beating on Peter about: psql is an application
> scripting tool, so you don't get to redefine its behavior at whim,
> anymore than you can change libpq's API at whim.
If this is the only objection, we could make the old behaviour available
by a SET command, as well as a command-line switch, as well as a
./configure option.
I hope we can get the best design here possible without over-emphasis
on compatibility.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-03 04:22:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-03 04:03:14 | Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-03 04:22:05 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-03 04:03:14 | Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Chapman | 2000-02-03 04:15:33 | SQL Query help needed |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-03 04:03:14 | Re: [GENERAL] Proposed Changes to PostgreSQL |