Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Going for 'all green' buildfarm results

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Going for 'all green' buildfarm results
Date: 2006-06-02 11:22:23
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Larry Rosenman said:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I've been making another pass over getting rid of buildfarm failures.
>> The remaining ones I see at the moment are:
>> firefly HEAD: intermittent failures in the stats test.  We seem to
>> have fixed every other platform back in January, but not this one.
>> firefly 7.4: dblink test fails, with what looks like an rpath problem.
>> Another one that we fixed awhile ago, and the fix worked on every
>> platform but this one.
>> firefly 7.3: trivial regression diffs; we could install variant
>> comparison files if anyone cared.
>> Firefly is obviously the outlier here.  I dunno if anyone cares
>> enough about SCO to spend time investigating it (I don't).  Most of
>> the others just need a little bit of attention from the machine
>> owner.
> If I generate fixes for firefly (I'm the owner), would they have a
> prayer  Of being applied?

Sure, although I wouldn't bother with 7.3 - just take 7.3 out of firefly's
build schedule. That's not carte blanche on fixes, of course - we'd have to
see them.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-06-02 12:16:46
Subject: Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-06-02 11:18:24
Subject: Re: 'CVS-Unknown' buildfarm failures?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group