| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Smith, Peter" <peters(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Jing Wang <jingwangian(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Elvis Pranskevichus <elprans(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority |
| Date: | 2020-11-25 01:07:14 |
| Message-ID: | 388250.1606266434@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
>> Agreed. If this is just a few hundred bytes of server-side local memory
>> per backend, it seems definitely worth it.
> Yeah, given the current set of GUC_REPORT variables, it's hard to see
> the storage for their last-reported values amounting to much. The need
> for an extra pointer field in each GUC variable record might eat more
> space than the actually-live values :-(
Here's a v2 that does it like that.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-report-guc-changes-at-query-end-2.patch | text/x-diff | 5.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2020-11-25 01:07:47 | RE: A few new options for CHECKPOINT |
| Previous Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2020-11-25 00:48:26 | Re: A few new options for CHECKPOINT |