| From: | Pawel Pierscionek <pawel(at)astercity(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hacers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Temporary tables |
| Date: | 1999-01-19 18:57:35 |
| Message-ID: | 3831.990119@astercity.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
I've already asked on pgsql-general but there was now answer so I'll
try here.
I have to play a lot with temp tables.
Could you pls, give me a hint on emulating them under Postgres.
I have to use them quite often with 10000 rows each.
I don't use indices cause I only cache a search result and don't need
any sorting, searching on temptables.
What's faster:
1)
once:
create tmptable;
many times:
delete from tmptable;
insert into tmptable select ... ;
or
2)
many times:
drop tmptable;
select ... into tmptable;
I prefer the second way since I have a lot of concurrent access and
create unique named tables under each transaction.
Unfortunately the DROP thing dumps a core under PLPGSQL function. :(
TIA,
Pawel
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-01-19 20:46:11 | Re: [HACKERS] KPGsql |
| Previous Message | John Holland | 1999-01-19 16:29:35 | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof |