| From: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Gregory Stark" <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Consistent \d commands in psql |
| Date: | 2008-03-31 15:27:31 |
| Message-ID: | 37ed240d0803310827v5cf91cbemc76dfb42da28cc4f@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On 01/04/2008, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> ... That means
> there'd be no way to replicate the all-functions-of-both-types behavior
> that has been the default in every prior release.
> \dfS -> sys functions only
> \dfU -> user functions only
> \dfSU -> all functions (should allow \dfUS spelling too)
> \df -> behavior proposed by Greg
How about \df* rather than (or in addition to) \dfSU & \dfUS?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2008-03-31 15:33:42 | Fwd: WIP: CASE statement for PL/pgSQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-31 15:10:27 | Re: Consistent \d commands in psql |