| From: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Cc: | "'pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree |
| Date: | 1999-09-28 09:01:22 |
| Message-ID: | 37F083E2.5C40D897@krs.ru |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
"Ansley, Michael" wrote:
>
> Hi, all,
>
> Whoever is doing the SSL stuff:
> In postmaster.c, at lines 995, and 1841, there is code that is not wrapped
> in the USE_SSL define.
>
> Last night I checked out the latest source, and couldn't get it to compile.
> It seems that the function heap_openr() has a new parameter, and there are
> calls that have not been updated yet. I was a little hesitant to go adding
> stuff, as the new parameter is a LOCKTYPE, and I wouldn't know what locks
> are required where, so I just left well alone. Any comments on this? There
> is another function which is paired up with it, but I forget the name, which
> also has a new parameter, it seems, and also has calls which have not yet
> been updated.
I fixed all this yesterday while committing my WAL changes...
Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 1999-09-28 09:54:48 | Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Latest tree |
| Previous Message | Ansley, Michael | 1999-09-28 08:39:18 | Latest tree |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | ciprut ethan | 1999-09-28 09:29:16 | |
| Previous Message | Ansley, Michael | 1999-09-28 08:39:18 | Latest tree |