Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: "Ken J(dot) Wright" <ken(at)ori-ind(dot)com>
Cc: Gregory W Burnham <gburnham(at)sfu(dot)ca>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Reply-To: missing
Date: 1999-07-01 02:48:45
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-interfaces
> >Does your email client have a 'reply to all' function?
> >That way you'll be replying to the person who wrote the
> >post, and the list.
> Yes, no problem there. But I'm still sending the original sender 2 copies.
> One from the list, and one from me. I don't mind, if you don't mind. I'm
> happy to do in Rome as the Romans do ;-)

procmail is your friend, and can filter out duplicate messages.
Especially with occasionally misbehaving mailing lists from various
projects, it makes things much happier for me...

                     - Thomas

Thomas Lockhart				lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Peter T MountDate: 1999-07-01 05:49:51
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] storing java objects
Previous:From: Thomas LockhartDate: 1999-07-01 02:45:50
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] How does operation with data types time???

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group