| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Ivanov <o15611(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #19340: Wrong result from CORR() function |
| Date: | 2025-12-02 17:22:07 |
| Message-ID: | 375068.1764696127@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Oleg Ivanov <o15611(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Yes, must be NULL in all the queries I have provided!
> But PostgreSQL curr() returns numbers, wich is incorrect.
Yeah, looks like roundoff error to me. In your example
SELECT corr( 0.09 , 0.09000001 ) FROM generate_series(1,25) ;
at the end of float8_corr we have
3754 PG_RETURN_FLOAT8(Sxy / sqrt(Sxx * Syy));
(gdb) i locals
transarray = <optimized out>
transvalues = 0x1b96da8
N = 25
Sxx = 3.2869204384208827e-34
Syy = 9.3266240309214617e-33
Sxy = -3.2869204384208827e-34
where ideally those three values would be zero (and we would have
fallen out with a NULL result at the preceding line).
It's fundamentally impossible to guarantee exact results with
floating-point arithmetic, so if you are expecting that you need
to readjust your expectations. But having said that, it does
seem a bit sad that we can't detect constant-input cases exactly.
I wonder whether it'd be worth carrying additional state to
check that explicitly (instead of assuming that "if (Sxx == 0 ||
Syy == 0)" will catch it).
You might find the previous discussion interesting:
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-12-02 17:22:28 | Re: BUG #19340: Wrong result from CORR() function |
| Previous Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-12-02 17:18:11 | Re: BUG #19341: REPLACE() fails to match final character when using nondeterministic ICU collation |