Re: [INTERFACES] Porting Postgres to NT procedures for English version.

From: Kevin Lo <jwlo(at)ms11(dot)hinet(dot)net>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, webmaster(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, JKraaijeveld(at)askesis(dot)nl, horak(at)mmp(dot)plzen-city(dot)cz, fk(at)akf(dot)dk, hal_snyder(at)sdsi(dot)com
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Porting Postgres to NT procedures for English version.
Date: 1999-05-13 19:29:46
Message-ID: 373B282A.AB5F0D2F@ms11.hinet.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > I had written procedures regarding porting Postgres to NT for Chinese
> > version.
> > Because many people sent me emails, they asked me to traslate this doc
> > into English, so I have already finished :)
>
> Would this be an appropriate doc to incorporate into the main Postgres
> documentation set, or do you think that it is best left separate, at
> least for now?

IMO, I think this doc would be incorporated into the main Postgres
documentation set. As Dan mentioned, 6.5 supports dynamicly loaded
modules, so it is possible to use plpgsql and other modules.

What do you think, Dan?

> - Thomas

-Kevin.

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martin Kuba 1999-05-14 15:25:32 JDBC driver should use database encoding
Previous Message Peter Harvey 1999-05-13 15:32:07 Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC Driver updated