Re: Adding comments to help understand psql hidden queries

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Maiquel Grassi <grassi(at)hotmail(dot)com(dot)br>, David Christensen <david+pg(at)pgguru(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Adding comments to help understand psql hidden queries
Date: 2026-03-23 23:03:41
Message-ID: 3707727.1774307021@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Notably, I didn't like that some of the headers said "table" and some said
>> "relation". I made them all say "table", although you could certainly
>> argue for the opposite.

> I originally had "table", but then it felt weird in my testing when I was
> describing a sequence or view it said table. So I'm a weak +1 for relation.

My preference for "table" is likewise weak. Anyone else have an
opinion?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-03-23 23:33:10 Re: Non-compliant SASLprep implementation for ASCII characters
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2026-03-23 22:54:28 Re: [PATCH] Provide support for trailing commas