Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PGCon 2008 RFP

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, "Dan Langille" <dan(at)langille(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PGCon 2008 RFP
Date: 2009-01-05 19:29:53
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 2:21 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:

> > No one puts the title of their session on every slide, so the basis
> > of your argument, that the slides themselves help you determine
> > which presentation you're in, seems bogus to me.
> It doesn't seem bogus to me, and I clocked about 200,000 miles last
> year doing presentations, the vast majority of which were quite
> popular.

That sounds like shameless self-promotion.  How is your statement relevant
to anything mentioned?

> > While the choice lies in the hands of the PGCon organizers, it
> > probably wouldn't hurt for JD to put up another poll like he did for
> > PG East planning.
> Actually, it would.  Those of us that have some experience on this
> matter think it's a rotten idea.

Then you could vote... just like everyone else :)

Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Jonah H. HarrisDate: 2009-01-05 19:30:39
Subject: Re: PGCon 2008 RFP
Previous:From: Jonah H. HarrisDate: 2009-01-05 19:25:12
Subject: Re: PGCon 2008 RFP

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group