Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Federated Postgresql architecture ?

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Marko Kreen" <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Federated Postgresql architecture ?
Date: 2008-06-30 13:34:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> But I want to clarify it's goal - it is not to run "pre-determined
> queries."  It is to run "pre-determined complex transactions."


> And to make those work in a "federated database" takes huge amount
> of complexity that PL/Proxy simply sidesteps.  At the price of
> requiring function-based API.  But as the function-based API has
> other advantages even without PL/Proxy, it seems fine tradeoff.

Agreed.  PL/Proxy has its own set of advantages.

As usual, it really just depends on the application and its requirements.

Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 |

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: C├ędric VillemainDate: 2008-06-30 13:54:08
Subject: Re: A guide/tutorial to performance monitoring and tuning
Previous:From: Marko KreenDate: 2008-06-30 13:16:26
Subject: Re: Federated Postgresql architecture ?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group