On 3/8/06, Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> wrote:
> You responded with a statement about synonyms having cost in response to a
> message of mine in response to a message from postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at which
> said "the costs will only be added if the "real table" is not found.
> therefore there is no impact on "normal" users." Your idea and that of the
> person who submitted this patch thus seem to be slightly different.
Yes, this is something that Hans and I would discuss about the patch.
I'd rather the feature follows the model you
> described (although I may have greater concerns of the cost) because it
> seems consistent with other lookups.
This is correct, for a synonym to be added, the cost for 1 synonym would be
the same as adding 1 more table/function/view/etc depending on the catalog
you're searching; I don't think it's too costly. I'm going to start a new
thread to propose this clearly.
Jonah H. Harris, Database Internals Architect
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: ITAGAKI Takahiro||Date: 2006-03-10 11:12:18|
|Subject: Re: Fix overflow of bgwriter's request queue |
|Previous:||From: ITAGAKI Takahiro||Date: 2006-03-09 06:53:28|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Automatic free space map filling|