| From: | "Robins Tharakan" <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fwd: Filter by Selection on Grid |
| Date: | 2008-02-06 11:02:51 |
| Message-ID: | 36af4bed0802060302x70311381tdd022a25feb42998@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
> ... snip ...
Sure ! Points that I'll take into account from now on.
> One other thing I noticed that should be fixed in a new patch - if you
> sort ascending on a column, and then sort descending, it will add
> both. It should remove the ascending and replace it with the
> descending sort.
True... and one more thing that I was working on (when I responded to Guillaume
the other day) was that if a person does an 'exclude by selection' on a
field with a value = 10, we simply put a [WHERE] value <> 10 filter...
however I think this is incomplete.
instead of
WHERE value <> 10
we should rather put
WHERE (value <> 10 OR value IS NULL)
Or
WHERE (value IS DISTINCT FROM 10)
This is because as per the UI, the user does not want value 10, but he still
would want a NULL value in the records.
However, this would not apply for cases of 'Filter by selection' where the
user would want only value = 10. There a WHERE value = 10 would remove rows
with NULL values as well.
**> But... an excellent first patch! I hope you'll stick around and come
> up with a few more similarly useful features :-)
Sure ! :)
*Robins*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2008-02-06 11:41:24 | Re: Fwd: Filter by Selection on Grid |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2008-02-06 10:31:19 | Re: Fwd: Filter by Selection on Grid |