| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Ken Egervari" <ken(at)upfactor(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Performance problem with semi-large tables |
| Date: | 2005-01-30 17:50:02 |
| Message-ID: | 3657.1107107402@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com> writes:
>> For example, let's add another filter to get all the shipments with
>> release code '5' that are 7 days old or newer.
>>
>> ss.date >= current_date - 7
> It's the order by + limit which makes the query behaves badly, and which
> forces use of kludges to use the index. If you add another condition like
> that, it should be a breeze.
Actually, that date condition has its own problem, namely that the
compared-to value isn't a constant. The 8.0 planner is able to realize
that this is a pretty selective condition, but prior releases fall back
on a very pessimistic default estimate. I'm sure that has something to
do with Ken not being able to get it to use an index on date.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | N S | 2005-01-30 18:04:10 | Re: Postgres server getting slow!! |
| Previous Message | PFC | 2005-01-30 11:10:55 | Re: Performance problem with semi-large tables |