Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > > One remaining problem is that you have to supply the oid in
> > > > > quotes, because regproc has to get a string, not an int. Perhaps
> > > > > we need another regprocin that allows int4 or char*, but I don't
> > > > > think you can allow two input functions for a type.
> > > > > Perhaps we can just leave it. We also output the proname, even if
> > > > > they used the oid as input.
> > > > The int4 vs. string issue would be easily solved by having a routine
> > > > regproc(int4), which the new type coersion stuff would use
> > > > automatically.
> But no one really assigns regproc fields. They usually do it through
> CREATE FUNCTION, and that would still require the quotes, so is it
> worth making that exception?
If you don't think so, no! ;-)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 1998-10-02 16:23:23|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] patching utilities?|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 1998-10-02 16:21:36|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply|