Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] regproc fix

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regproc fix
Date: 1998-10-02 14:26:46
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> One remaining problem is that you have to supply the oid in quotes,
> because regproc has to get a string, not an int.  Perhaps we need
> another regprocin that allows int4 or char*, but I don't think you can
> allow two input functions for a type.
> Perhaps we can just leave it.  We also output the proname, even if 
> they used the oid as input.

The int4 vs. string issue would be easily solved by having a routine
regproc(int4), which the new type coersion stuff would use

                        - Tom

In response to

  • regproc fix at 1998-10-02 05:28:26 from Bruce Momjian


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 1998-10-02 14:40:36
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] delete from ..;vacuum crashes
Previous:From: Tatsuo IshiiDate: 1998-10-02 14:16:10
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] delete from ..;vacuum crashes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group