Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> schrieb:
>Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> I refreshed the patch so it works again on current HEAD. Basically
>> trivial fixes and dfd26f9c5f371437f243249025863ea9911aacaa. The
>> seem necessary to me after the changes, so I simply ditched it. Am I
>No, that was only needed because execMain.c was overriding somebody
>else's tuple receiver. If you're putting the right receiver into the
>QueryDesc to start with, it shouldn't be necessary.
>I'm confused by this though:
>> This basically includes a revert of
>I don't find that commit ID anywhere.
That should have been the aforementioned commit. Must have screwed up the copy&paste buffer. Sorry for that.
Please excuse the brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2012-02-28 02:12:08|
|Subject: Re: Command Triggers|
|Previous:||From: Noah Misch||Date: 2012-02-28 00:28:14|
|Subject: Re: foreign key locks, 2nd attempt|