Re: [INTERFACES] iodbc interface on Unix

From: Byron Nikolaidis <byronn(at)insightdist(dot)com>
To: Gerald Gryschuk <ggryschuk(at)scf(dot)sk(dot)ca>
Cc: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Postgres Interfaces Mailing List <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] iodbc interface on Unix
Date: 1998-08-26 13:25:00
Message-ID: 35E40CAC.FBA3F8EB@insightdist.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Gerald Gryschuk wrote:

> Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> > So, I just finished removing the stubs and internal calls which I had
> > added in (having now found the linker options which make sure things
> > resolve within the library), when I found some additional stubs which
> > are in results.c. They have been there since before I touched the code.
> > Are they required for Windows? If so, why aren't the other routines
> > required to be stubbed as they were on my Unix box without the right
> > linker options??
>
> With the "-Bsymbolic" flag(which I found only after you mentioned it)
> than none of
> these _SQL stubs are needed. Byron only added the _SQL stubs when I told
> him that
> there was a problem that I thought was related to an ODBC spec issue
> which was really
> just this problem all along. In other words my ignorance led me to a
> mistaken conclusion, which we have attempted to fix in the wrong way
> ever since. I really must apologize.
>
> So I'm positive its o.k. if you dust all references to _SQL functions.
>

This -Bsymbolic option is great news! Yes, indeed, go ahead and dust the
_SQL stubs in results.c!

Byron (minus one pair of tonsils)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Byron Nikolaidis 1998-08-26 13:38:13 Re: [INTERFACES] new odbc fails
Previous Message David Hartwig 1998-08-26 12:54:28 Re: [SQL] excel vs. money data type?