| From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Good <tomg(at)nrnet(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Linux Oracle! (fwd) |
| Date: | 1998-07-21 16:33:47 |
| Message-ID: | 35B4C2EB.59FA191C@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Thomas - get a load of this...I argued with these guys for 2
> years. And now when PostgreSQL makes it irrelevant, they port.
Well, it will be interesting to see how they do. They can't beat us on
price, and don't have a particularly open interface, but it might be fun
to try to interoperate with them...
> "In the last couple of weeks, there's been this huge groundswell for
> Linux," the representative said.
Two weeks??!(at)??
> A version of Oracle8 for Linux on the Intel platform is planned for
> shipment by March 1999. Support for other hardware platforms is likely
> to follow.
If they hold true to form, they will announce now and take three years
to actually port the full features from their current product. Oracle,
at least as of 4 years ago, was the _worst_ company I've seen for
vaporware and misleading product information. They did a demo at work
(JPL) for their new product set running on three separate platforms.
Pretty neat, eh? Except that it turned out that _none_ of the products
running on any one of the platforms was available on the other platforms
in the demo. Forms on a Windows machine, db on a Sun, something else on
a Mac, and no current product available for all three. Pretty slimy
salesmanship :(
- Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-07-21 16:36:08 | Re: Complexity of contrib types |
| Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1998-07-21 16:33:22 | Re: [HACKERS] proposals for LLL, part 1 |