Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: David Hartwig <daveh(at)insightdist(dot)com>
Cc: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Access & Postgres
Date: 1998-07-09 14:25:30
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces
> I am curious though.   Did you apply the patch, mentioned below, to 
> your latest 6.4 tree?    This patch should have been already part of 
> the latest 6.4.   And, to my knowledge, it was already applied 
> completely and successfully.

I did my final tests using a fresh cvs tree two days ago just before
committing my big "patch wad". In the last two or three weeks I did have
a "merge problem" with my patches in the resjunk area, which might have
been the patches you are talking about.

> Now that I think of it, though, this version of the patch does not 
> include the new "output" and "sql"  files necessary for the regression 
> test.   In any case, I should clean that up.

I am in the process of renaming and moving the "resjunk" test to
"select_implicit". Will try to commit the changes this morning so it is
available to you.

At the moment, all regression tests (except "random") pass on my Linux
box :)

                        - Tom

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Maarten BoekholdDate: 1998-07-09 14:31:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Backend as SW Gateway to Oracle
Previous:From: Egon SchmidDate: 1998-07-09 14:17:10
Subject: InitPostgres() fails through libpq

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Cyril FERRANDDate: 1998-07-09 14:49:04
Subject: a JDBC applet
Previous:From: David HartwigDate: 1998-07-09 14:13:43
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] AOLserver 2.3

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group