Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] custom types and optimization

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Brett McCormick <brett(at)work(dot)chicken(dot)org>
Cc: Kevin Heflin <kheflin(at)shreve(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] custom types and optimization
Date: 1998-06-01 06:11:34
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
> I'm "in the process of" preparing a contrib module for this purpose.
> Real Soon Now.
> > The only problem I haven't been able to fix to date is calling 
> > "Dates" from a database and displaying them like "Sunday May 31, 
> > 1998" instead "05-31-1998"

Hmm. Should we have the date type pay attention to the SET DATESTYLE
command? I think it doesn't at the moment...

                      - Tom

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-06-01 06:15:33
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] duplicate oids in pg_proc
Previous:From: Hal SnyderDate: 1998-06-01 05:33:35
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Query cancel and OOB data (fwd)

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Christian SteindlDate: 1998-06-01 09:29:22
Subject: problem compiling under suse 5.1
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 1998-06-01 04:12:34
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] custom types and optimization

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group