Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Well, we are not the "Make Merlin Happy club". ;-)
Merlin and Andrew were the ones complaining initially. If they feel
that a proposed patch doesn't fix the problem, then I'd say that it
isn't fixing the problem.
> My personal opinion is that adding #defines to PQinitSSL() is the right
> level of fix, and if we ever implement a libpq init mechanism we can
> convert PGinitSSL to a macro. I am attaching a sample patch for
This is just a rehash of one of the patches that was discussed earlier.
There wasn't consensus for it then, and there's not now.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Chernow||Date: 2009-03-28 20:22:01|
|Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2009-03-28 19:31:17|
|Subject: Re: Should SET ROLE inherit config params?|