Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Contributor List policy

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Date: 2008-03-11 01:47:06
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Hash: SHA1

- --On Monday, March 10, 2008 17:40:46 -0700 "Joshua D. Drake" 
<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> I do not care if I am personally listed.

Actually, I don't disagree that you should be listed, I disagree with merging 
Contributor and Developer into one ... there should be two lists, of which you 
would definitely be label'd a 'Major Contributor' ...

> My concern which has been stated on multiple points on this thread is
> that people who are major contributors are recognized as such,
> regardless of their code contributions.

Agreed, but distinguishing between 'contributor' and 'developer' doesn't 
diminish that ...

> I suggest a multi-tiered list that is representative for each group
> including developers.

Sorry, must have missed that part of the thread ... could you do a quick mock 
up of what you are thinking on the above?

- ----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org                              MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy               Skype:        ICQ . 7615664
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)


In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-11 01:55:08
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2008-03-11 00:43:34
Subject: Re: Contributor List policy

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group