| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Contributor List policy |
| Date: | 2008-03-11 01:47:06 |
| Message-ID: | 3543924B67ABC3DB8DB1B41D@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Monday, March 10, 2008 17:40:46 -0700 "Joshua D. Drake"
<jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I do not care if I am personally listed.
Actually, I don't disagree that you should be listed, I disagree with merging
Contributor and Developer into one ... there should be two lists, of which you
would definitely be label'd a 'Major Contributor' ...
> My concern which has been stated on multiple points on this thread is
> that people who are major contributors are recognized as such,
> regardless of their code contributions.
Agreed, but distinguishing between 'contributor' and 'developer' doesn't
diminish that ...
> I suggest a multi-tiered list that is representative for each group
> including developers.
Sorry, must have missed that part of the thread ... could you do a quick mock
up of what you are thinking on the above?
- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFH1eSa4QvfyHIvDvMRAmTBAKDCJ9Pjdrz6+PbIgB73mE8hJKPKsACgzaVG
b3hZYvqhTaoyYY8abOe8ppU=
=FBPA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-03-11 01:55:08 | Re: Contributor List policy |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-03-11 00:43:34 | Re: Contributor List policy |