Re: Suggestions for PgAccess [Accepted in version 0.86]

From: Constantin Teodorescu <teo(at)flex(dot)ro>
To: Michael Bussmann <bus(at)fgan(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suggestions for PgAccess [Accepted in version 0.86]
Date: 1998-03-29 12:08:06
Message-ID: 351E39A6.3474B0B6@flex.ro
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

I am using this reply also to announce a new version for PgAccess.
There are no major changes.
PgAccess now support command line parameter that means the database to
be loaded.
A bug fix in table/query display window.

Michael Bussmann wrote:
>
> First of all, thanks for this great tool! I'd just like to report 2 things
> I noticed when working with pgaccess 0.80.
> a) What about supporting command line arguments? Entering
> pgaccess <dbname> is a bit easier than having to click to Database, then
> Open, then entering the dbname.

Done.

> b) Can hardly be described as a bug, but this behaviour of pgaccess
> sometimes confuses me:
>
> I opened a table viewer frame for table 'A`. Currently there's no
> special sort order. After entering the sort field, and pressing reload
> the table is sorted. Now I'm double-clicking on another table 'B` and
> this table gets displayed in the table viewer. This time the table is
> _not_ sorted, but the 'sort field' still contains the value I specified
> before.
> Maybe the sort field should be cleared before displaying a new table?
> [Same behaviour with the field 'Filter conditions']

Fixed.

--
Constantin Teodorescu
FLEX Consulting Braila, ROMANIA

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Constantin Teodorescu 1998-03-29 14:04:10 Re: pgaccess difficulties on pg6.3
Previous Message Thomas Good 1998-03-29 11:58:11 Re: pgaccess difficulties on pg6.3