| From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Gould <dg(at)illustra(dot)com> |
| Cc: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, scrappy(at)hub(dot)org, dz(at)cs(dot)unitn(dot)it, hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] patches for 6.2.1p6 |
| Date: | 1998-03-17 16:45:10 |
| Message-ID: | 350EA896.ADABF8C9@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> But, it may be best to leave this until after the mega patch. I am not
> sure I want to share the blame ;-).
>
> Just to fill me in, where does the mega patch fall in with the next
> release snapshot? That is, if this misses the mega patch is it waiting
> until 6.4?
I would guess that we could post a separate patch any time soon,
especially since the changes are apparently isolated to only a few
places in the code. In the last release, we posted ~7 patches, each
independent of the others, and generated on our local source trees. Each
of the patches was, however, fairly simple, quite often only one or a
few lines of change, and were intended as bug fixes. Also, they were
easily tested. In any case, at a minimum the regression test should be
run (and passed!).
- Tom
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jackson, DeJuan | 1998-03-17 17:11:57 | RE: [HACKERS] First mega-patch... |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-03-17 16:33:28 | Re: Unix Domain Sockets error (was Re: [HACKERS] Alpha initdb fixed!) |