From: | "Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Zdenek Kotala" <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, "Xiao Meng" <mx(dot)cogito(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: hash index improving v3 |
Date: | 2008-09-05 01:54:51 |
Message-ID: | 34d269d40809041854g355a8f68ga3a037a69e3d9fcb@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> So what we need for testing is a few different key values that hash to
> the same code. Not sure about an easy way to find such.
Hrm, well I have not really looked at the hash algorithm but I assume
we could just reduce the number of buckets?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andriy Bakay | 2008-09-05 02:01:51 | Re: SSL problems |
Previous Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2008-09-05 01:51:14 | Re: hash index improving v3 |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-05 02:04:57 | Re: [HACKERS] TODO item: Implement Boyer-Moore searching (First time hacker) |
Previous Message | Alex Hunsaker | 2008-09-05 01:51:14 | Re: hash index improving v3 |