From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)topsystem(dot)de> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Lost a function overloading capability in v6.3 |
Date: | 1998-03-03 14:33:47 |
Message-ID: | 34FC14CB.16373A2@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Thomas G. Lockhart writes:
> > CREATE FUNCTION abstime_datetime(int4)
> > RETURNS datetime
> > AS '-' LANGUAGE 'internal';
>
> Did that. Could anyone please tell me how to drop this function?
destroydbcreatedb
Oops. Sorry about that. The good news is that the function isn't damaging to
your system :-/
> > When I run this same thing on v6.3, I get a date sometime in 1974 which
> > I think might actually be derived from a pointer interpreted as an
> > integer :(
> >
> > postgres=> select abstime_datetime(0);
> > abstime_datetime
> > ----------------------------
> > Wed Apr 24 18:51:28 1974 GMT
> > (1 row)
> > postgres=> select abstime_datetime(900000000);
> > abstime_datetime
> > ----------------------------
> > Wed Apr 24 18:37:12 1974 GMT
> > (1 row)
>
> mm=> select abstime_datetime(0);
> abstime_datetime
> ----------------
> epoch
> (1 row)
>
> mm=> select abstime_datetime(900000000);
> abstime_datetime
> ----------------
> epoch
> (1 row)
OK, so that is on a v6.3 system Michael? Then does anyone have an idea why
my system is showing a problem? Can someone running on Linux (RH4.2, 2.0.30
kernel) try this out?? _Everything_ in the regression tests is OK...
- Tom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-03-03 14:35:09 | Re: [HACKERS] text should be a blob field |
Previous Message | Michael Meskes | 1998-03-03 14:06:14 | Re: [HACKERS] Current 6.3 issues |