Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Subselects and NOTs

From: "Vadim B(dot) Mikheev" <vadim(at)sable(dot)krasnoyarsk(dot)su>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: Mattias Kregert <matti(at)algonet(dot)se>, ocie(at)paracel(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Subselects and NOTs
Date: 1998-02-24 02:48:41
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> > This is exactly how Postgres works now and differ from 3 "big boys".
> > If there are no objections then I'll leave this as is. We can return
> > to this issue latter.
> I interprete SQL92 the same way. Let's leave as-is indefinitely/forever...

Nice for me. There are so many more important issues :)


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-02-24 02:57:49
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression: select_views.sql
Previous:From: Thomas G. LockhartDate: 1998-02-24 02:37:02
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Here it is - view permissions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group