Re: AW: Assorted improvements in pg_dump

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hans Buschmann <buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: AW: Assorted improvements in pg_dump
Date: 2021-12-07 16:18:17
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hans Buschmann <buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net> writes:
> I noticed that you patched master with all the improvements in pg_dump.
> Did you change your mind about backpatching patch 0005 to fix the toast size matter?

I looked briefly at that and found that the patch would have to be
largely rewritten, because getTables() looks quite different in the
older branches. I'm not really sufficiently excited about the point
to do that rewriting and re-testing. I think that cases where the
old logic gets the scheduling badly wrong are probably rare.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-12-07 16:19:27 Re: ExecTypeSetColNames is fundamentally broken
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-12-07 15:59:45 Re: Dubious usage of TYPCATEGORY_STRING