| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: wake up logical workers after ALTER SUBSCRIPTION |
| Date: | 2023-01-06 22:31:26 |
| Message-ID: | 3355444.1673044286@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I found some additional places that should remove the last-start time from
> the hash table. I've added those in v14.
I've pushed 0001 and 0002, which seem pretty uncontroversial.
Attached is a rebased 0003, just to keep the cfbot happy.
I'm kind of wondering whether 0003 is worth the complexity TBH,
but in any case I ran out of time to look at it closely today.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v15-0001-bypass-wal_retrieve_retry_interval-for-logical-w.patch | text/x-diff | 14.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2023-01-06 22:41:48 | Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample |
| Previous Message | Dag Lem | 2023-01-06 22:27:28 | Re: daitch_mokotoff module |