Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
Date: 2004-03-10 00:14:20
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> We've set up a new host,

Why is it not part of  Seems like making it a different
domain will increase the perception of separateness from the core
project, which is something I thought we wanted to avoid.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2004-03-10 00:49:34
Subject: Re: pgFoundry WAS: On pgweb project
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2004-03-09 21:53:10
Subject: Re: Update on 'portal' changes

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bill MoranDate: 2004-03-10 00:31:06
Subject: Re: Shouldn't B'1' = 1::bit be true?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-03-09 23:50:31
Subject: Re: Stuff that doesn't work yet in IPv6 patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group